Cases 21 - 30 of 31
SANSANO v. THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv01412
Plaintiff:
ISABEL F. SANSANO
Defendant:
THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORPORATION , THE BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE, ROBERT PEREGO and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
SCHOTT v. BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP et al
as 2:2011cv01324
Plaintiff:
JAYSON SCHOTT
Defendant:
BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP, BANK OF AMERICA, AMERICA'S WHOLESALE LENDERS and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01433
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
MIGHTY v. THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2010cv01172
Plaintiff:
DENISE MIGHTY
Defendant:
THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA and THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
SMITH v. THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv00678
Plaintiff:
HERMAN L. SMITH
Defendant:
THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00169
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
MILLER v. MELLON LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN et al
as 2:2009cv01166
Plaintiff:
ARLENE MILLER
Defendant:
MELLON LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN, CORPORATE BENEFITS COMMITTEE, SHEILA MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00929
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00823
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00586
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
