Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Obama v. Obama
as 4:2022cv00588
Plaintiff:
Zaesliv H Obama and Shanta Y. Claiborne
Defendant:
Barack H Obama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Robinson v. Obama
as 5:2014cv00180
Plaintiff:
Dayrin L Robinson, Sr
Defendant:
Barack H Obama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Demos v. The U.S. Secretary of Defense et al
as 5:2012mc01217
Defendant:
C.I.A. Director, President Barack H. Obama, The Governor of the State of Washington and others
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00227
Notice Only Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00173
Notice Only Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00167
Notice Only Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Kim v. Napolitano et al
as 3:2011cv00261
Defendant:
AFOD Ivan Jackson, Adrian Macias, DPO Moreno and others
Notice Only Party:
Magdalena Jara
Plaintiff:
Younggil Kim
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Perales v. U. S. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 3:2010cv02621
Plaintiff:
Azael Dythian Perales
Defendant:
U. S. Internal Revenue Service, U. S. Department of Labor, Hilda L. Solis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hunter v. U.S. Supreme Court et al
as 2:2008cv00232
Plaintiff:
Darrel Reece Hunter
Defendant:
U.S. Supreme Court, Barack H Obama, John McCain and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
