Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Melone v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 2:2021cv02097
Plaintiff:
Joseph Benedict Melone
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Unknown Party, Social Security Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thompson v. Cimino et al
as 2:2021cv01354
Plaintiff:
Richard Wayne Thompson
Defendant:
Michael Cimino and Barbara Broderick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Olmos v. Broderick et al
as 2:2019cv04832
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Frank Milstead, Barbara Broderick and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Paul Olmos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ford v. Broderick et al
as 2:2017cv00159
Petitioner:
Richard D Ford
Respondent:
Barbara Broderick and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sherman v. Broderick et al
as 2:2016cv01794
Petitioner:
Roy Gene Sherman, Jr.
Respondent:
Barbara Broderick and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ludeman v. Broderick et al
as 2:2013cv01712
Petitioner:
Roger David Ludeman
Respondent:
Barbara Broderick and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Carter v. Broderick et al
as 2:2012cv02026
Petitioner:
Robert Anthony Carter
Respondent:
Barbara Broderick, Tom Horn, Karen Hom and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morgan v. Maricopa County Adult Probation Department et al
as 2:2012cv00464
Plaintiff:
James Michael Morgan
Defendant:
Maricopa County Adult Probation Department, Barbara Broderick, Rochelle Harlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeMarco v. Broderick et al
as 2:2012cv00005
Plaintiff:
Leonard DeMarco
Defendant:
Barbara Broderick, Linda Dorie, Aaron Carreon-Ainsa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00854
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
