Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Barley v. Edwards et al
as 7:2015cv00995
Plaintiff:
Leon Barley, Jr.
Defendant:
M. Edwards, J. Hughey, Barren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barley v. Edwards et al
as 7:2015cv00994
Plaintiff:
Leon Barley, Jr.
Defendant:
Michael Edwards, D. Walker, J. Hutton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barley v. Alabama Department of Mental Health et al
as 5:2014cv01543
Petitioner:
Herman Barley
Respondent:
Alabama Department of Mental Health and Roxanna Bender
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Barley v. Barry et al
as 7:2014cv01401
Plaintiff:
Leon Barley
Defendant:
Angela Barry, Lawrence Edmund, S Thurman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barley v. Autauga County Commissioners et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv00055
Plaintiff:
Leon Barley, Jr.
Defendant:
Autauga County Commissioners, James Johnson, Larry Nixon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barley v. IHS/Jefferson County Jail et al
as 2:2013cv01595
Plaintiff:
Leon Barley, Jr.
Defendant:
IHS/Jefferson County Jail, Mike Hale and Jefferson County Board of Commissioners
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barley v. Houston et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00534
Plaintiff:
Daniel M. Barley
Defendant:
Randall V. Houston and Mandy Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barley v. Bentley et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2011cv00974
Plaintiff:
Daniel M. Barley
Defendant:
Robert Bentley , Kim Tobias Thomas , Leeposey Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barley v. Jamison et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2010cv01036
Plaintiff:
Daniel M. Barley
Defendant:
Leroy Jamison, Richard Allen, Willie Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barley v. Jamison et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2010cv00989
Plaintiff:
Daniel M. Barley
Defendant:
Leroy Jamison, Richard Allen, Willie Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
