Cases 1 - 10 of 73
v. DONATE et al
as 5:2023cv01876
Defendant:
JANINE DONATE, KYLE RUSSELL, STEVEN MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. DONATE et al
as 5:2023cv01877
Plaintiff:
SARAH JACKSON
Defendant:
LEHIGH COUNTY, JANINE DONATE, KYLE RUSSELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BARLOW, JR. v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2023cv00538
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY BARLOW, JR.
Defendant:
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
GOEATED LTD v. BARLOW et al
as 2:2022cv04903
Plaintiff:
GOEATED LTD
Defendant:
CURTIS EDWARD BARLOW, JR and 484 ENTERTAINMENT LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Barlow v. Progressive Specialty Insurance Company
as 3:2022cv01736
Plaintiff:
George Barlow
Defendant:
Progressive Specialty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
SWAINSON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2022cv02163
Plaintiff:
ANDREW SWAINSON
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, OFFICER MANUEL SANTIAGO, OFFICER MICHAEL COHEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United Specialty Insurance Company v. JB Trans et al
as 4:2021cv02092
Plaintiff:
United Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant:
JB Trans, Jaswant Singh, James R. Wolfe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Kozak et al v. Klikuszewski et al
as 4:2021cv01609
Plaintiff:
Patricia M. Kozak and Brian D. Kozak
Defendant:
Edward J. Klikuszewski and Barlow Trucking Lines
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BARLOW-AHSAN v. SAUL
as 2:2021cv02220
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE BARLOW-AHSAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00586
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
