Cases 1 - 10 of 151
Jones v. Integrated Medical Solutions et al
as 1:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
Clyde Jones
Defendant:
Integrated Medical Solutions, John Keelen, Diane Sommer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Perkins v. Wapinsky et al
as 1:2023cv02126
Plaintiff:
Hakeim Perkins
Defendant:
Warden David Wapinsky, Deputy Warden Buchanan, Captain Bowman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv05101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Paul v. Wapinsky et al
as 1:2023cv02125
Plaintiff:
Frank Paul
Defendant:
David Wapinsky, Deputy Warden Buchanan, Captain Bowman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Wapinsky et al
as 1:2023cv02118
Plaintiff:
David Miller
Defendant:
David Wapinsky, Buchanan, Bowman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hannon v. Wapinsky et al
as 1:2023cv02120
Plaintiff:
Ladell Hannon
Defendant:
David Wapinsky, Buchanan, Bowman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lopez v. Wapinsky et al
as 1:2023cv02121
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lopez
Defendant:
David Wapinsky, Buchanan, Bowman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Wapinsky et al
as 1:2023cv02119
Plaintiff:
Austin Hall
Defendant:
David Wapinsky, Buchanan, Bowman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Minnich v. Wapinsky et al
as 1:2023cv02122
Plaintiff:
Joseph Minnich
Defendant:
David Wapinsky, Buchanan, Bowman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. Wapinsky et al
as 1:2023cv02117
Plaintiff:
Julius Gonzalez
Defendant:
David Wapinsky, Buchanan, Bowman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
