Cases 1 - 10 of 367
Hill v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Sacramento
as 24-1583
Petitioner:
NATHAN HILL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Interested Party:
GAVIN NEWSOM, RALPH DIAZ, Director of CDCR, KEN CLARK, Warden of CSP-Corcoran and others
Magdalina Kalincheva v. Jews and Non-human hybrid Evil Jews Blacks et al
as 2:2024mc00033
Plaintiff:
Magdalina Kalincheva, Jesse Neubarth and Jeffrey Neubarth
Cross Defendant:
Jews and Non-human hybrid Evil Jews Blacks, UA Valentyna and Child22A Lesovitskaya, 10 RICO Liza and others
Gera v. Barra et al
as 1:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
Samhita Gera
Defendant:
Mary T. Barra, Paul A. Jacobson, Aneel Bhusri and others
Gera v. Barra et al
as 2:2024cv10254
Plaintiff:
Samhita Gera
Defendant:
Mary T. Barra, Paul A. Jacobson, Aneel Bhusri and others
Hollywood Police Officers' Retirement System v. General Motors Company et al
as 4:2024cv10182
Plaintiff:
Hollywood Police Officers' Retirement System
Defendant:
General Motors Company, Mary T. Barra and Paul A. Jacobson
(PC) Barra v. Wilson et al
as 1:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lawrence Barra
Defendant:
Wilson, Ziegler and Scotti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Barra v. Tulare County Sheriff's Office Department
as 1:2023cv01756
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lawrence Barra
Defendant:
Tulare County Sheriff's Office Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Barra v. Tulare County Sheriff's Department
as 1:2023cv01746
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lawrence Barra
Defendant:
Tulare County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Audrey McAdams v. Susan E. Arnold et al
as 2:2023cv10542
Plaintiff:
Audrey McAdams
Defendant:
Susan E. Arnold, Mary T. Barra, Safra A. Catz and others
Shamoon v. General Motors Company et al
as 4:2023cv13132
Plaintiff:
Edward Shamoon
Defendant:
General Motors Company, Mary T. Barra and Paul A. Jacobson
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
