Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Love v. Eddlemon et al
as 1:2023cv01430
Plaintiff:
George E Love
Defendant:
. Eddlemon, . Reese, . Barren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TV Tokyo Corporation v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto
as 1:2023cv14286
Plaintiff:
TV Tokyo Corporation
Defendant:
The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto, abrellkfhanog8, AliceCCughan and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Barren v. AFAM Concept, Inc. d/b/a JF Labs, Inc., et al
as 1:2023cv08759
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Barren
Defendant:
AFAM Concept, Inc. d/b/a JF Labs, Inc.,, Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC, LOreal USA Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Barren v. Beachum et al
as 1:2020cv06180
Plaintiff:
Cecil Barren
Defendant:
Amanda Gallegos, Joseph Glunto, Thomas J. Dart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Colvin v. Judge Norma et al
as 4:2017cv04079
Plaintiff:
Brandon Colvin, Sr
Defendant:
Judge Norma, Judge Farbe, Matthew Durbin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Barren v. Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter Railroad Corporation
as 1:2013cv04390
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Barren
Defendant:
Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter Railroad Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
United States Of America v. Barren
as 1:2008cv01778
Plaintiff:
United States Of America and United States Of America
Defendant:
Demetrius Barren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Barren v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2007cv02000
Plaintiff:
Andre Barren, Andre Barren and Andre Barren
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Dallas Burright and Jason Bala
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
