Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-5019
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Friedrich Lu v. Julio Castillo, et al
as 23-5011
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Friedrich Lu
Defendant / Appellee:
Julio A. Castillo, Clerk, Anna Blackburne-Rigsby, Chief Judge, Roslynn R. Mauskopf, Director and others
LU v. CASTILLO et al
as 1:2022cv03683
Plaintiff:
FRIEDRICH LU
Defendant:
JULIO A. CASTILLO, ANNA BLACKBURNE-RIGSBY, ROSLYNN R. MAUSKOPF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-5060
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01831
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Jamal Kifafi v. Hilton Hotel Retirement Plan, et al
as 21-7025
Defendant / Appellee:
Barron Hilton, James M. Anderson, members of the Hilton Hotels Retirement Plan Committee, Hilton Hotels Corporation and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jamal J. Kifafi, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated
OKEREKE v. TORRUELLA et al
as 1:2020cv00042
Defendant:
GERALD E. LYNCH, WILLIAM J. KAYATTA, JR., JEFFREY R. HOWARD and others
Plaintiff:
PRECIOUS OKEREKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
EL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2019cv00381
Defendant:
LYNSEY M. BARRON, AMY TOTENBERG, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff:
JAAME AMUN RE EL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
BRICKLAYERS & TROWEL TRADES INTERNATIONAL PENSION FUND et al v. JOANN BARRON
as 1:2018cv00165
Plaintiff:
BRICKLAYERS & TROWEL TRADES INTERNATIONAL PENSION FUND and INTERNATIONAL MASONRY INSTITUTE
Defendant:
JOANN BARRON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
