Cases 1 - 10 of 18
LU v. CASTILLO et al
as 1:2022cv03683
Plaintiff:
FRIEDRICH LU
Defendant:
JULIO A. CASTILLO, ANNA BLACKBURNE-RIGSBY, ROSLYNN R. MAUSKOPF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01831
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
OKEREKE v. TORRUELLA et al
as 1:2020cv00042
Defendant:
GERALD E. LYNCH, WILLIAM J. KAYATTA, JR., JEFFREY R. HOWARD and others
Plaintiff:
PRECIOUS OKEREKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
EL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2019cv00381
Defendant:
LYNSEY M. BARRON, AMY TOTENBERG, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff:
JAAME AMUN RE EL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
BRICKLAYERS & TROWEL TRADES INTERNATIONAL PENSION FUND et al v. JOANN BARRON
as 1:2018cv00165
Plaintiff:
BRICKLAYERS & TROWEL TRADES INTERNATIONAL PENSION FUND and INTERNATIONAL MASONRY INSTITUTE
Defendant:
JOANN BARRON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
BARRON v. USA
as 1:2016cv01314
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
PERCY BARRON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00446
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
M. B. et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2014cv00394
Plaintiff:
M. B. and MARNI BARRON
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
BARRON INDUSTRIES, INC. et al v. SEBELIUS et al
as 1:2013cv01330
Plaintiff:
BARRON INDUSTRIES, INC. , PAUL BARRON and BRUCE BARRON
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS , UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES , JACK LEW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2012cv01948
Plaintiff:
BARRON JACKSON
Defendant:
GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and DANIEL KELLY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
