Cases 1 - 10 of 13
In re: Michael Gresham
as 22-1466
Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL GRESHAM
Respondent:
MICHAEL BURGESS, named as Barry McLemore
Johnson v. Granholm et al
as 2:2010cv10005
Plaintiff:
Richard Johnson
Defendant:
Jennifer Granholm, John Cherry, Attorney General and others
George Jurich v. Barry McLemore
as 09-2429
Petitioner - Appellant:
GEORGE JURICH
Respondent - Appellee:
BARRY MCLEMORE, Warden
Andre Coleman v. Brian Sweeney, et al
as 09-2419
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDRE LEE COLEMAN, aka Andre Lee Coleman-Bey
Defendant - Appellee:
BRIAN SWEENEY, ARUS at Barage Max. - in his individual and official capacities, WILLIAN LEUTZOW, Retired Former A/Deputy - in his individual and official capacities, RALPH SACKETT, RUM at Baraga Max. - in his individual and official capacities and others
Roy Jones, Jr. v. Patricia Caruso, et al
as 09-2355
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROY D. JONES, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICIA CARUSO, Warden, Director, in her individual capacity, DARLENE EDLUND, Then Deputy Warden, in her individual and official capacity, GREG MCQUIGGIN, Warden, in his individual and official capacity and others
Defendant:
SUSAN BURKE, Hearing Officer, in her individual capacity, BARRY MCLEMORE, Warden, Deputy Director, in his individual and official capacity, TIMOTHY LUOMA, Then Warden, in his individual and official capacity and others
Coleman #173324 v. Sweeney et al
as 2:2009cv00178
Plaintiff:
Andre Lee Coleman #173324
Defendant:
Brian Sweeney, William Leutzow, Ralph Sackett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones #235548 v. Caruso et al
as 2:2008cv00192
Plaintiff:
Roy D. Jones #235548, Jr.
Defendant:
Patricia Caruso, Susan Burke, Barry McLemore and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Germain Skinner v. Barry McLemore
as 08-1353
Petitioner - Appellant:
GERMAIN SKINNER
Respondent - Appellee:
BARRY MCLEMORE, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
