Cases 1 - 10 of 106
Bartell Hotels v. S/V Scotch Miss
as 3:2023cv00482
Plaintiff:
Bartell Hotels A California Limited Partnership doing business as Half Moon Marina
Defendant:
S/V Scotch Miss
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 31301 Federal Maritime Lien Act
Louis Abramson et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv05041
Plaintiff:
Lisa Brown, Louis Abramson, John Ackley and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02816
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Bartel et al v. Starbucks Corporation et al
as 2:2022at00122
Plaintiff:
Amanda Bartel and David Bartel
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation and Pactiv Packaging, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bartel et al v. Starbucks Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv00134
Plaintiff:
Amanda Bartel and David Bartel
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation and Pactiv Packaging, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
(PC) Bradford v. Mebane et al
as 2:2021cv01410
Plaintiff:
Raymond Alford Bradford
Defendant:
Darnell Mebane, T. Donahue, B. Bartel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01341
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1988
(PC) Ernst v. Ramos
as 2:2021cv00813
Plaintiff:
Scott Keith Ernst
Defendant:
David Frances Ramos, Dean Sloan, Ansad Onyama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv03288
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
St. Tropica, Inc. v. Giovanni Cosmetics, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv10327
Defendant:
Does 1-10, Nugget Market, Inc., Roche Bros., Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
St. Tropica, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
