Cases 1 - 10 of 26
United States of America et al. v. Bartell et al.
as 1:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
United States of America and Anthony G. Peart
Defendant:
Jonathan Bartell, Kari L. Burns, Jessica Lucko and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Leathers et al v. United States et al
as 1:2023cv00175
Plaintiff:
Anne M Leathers, Michael Roe, Jr., Lonnie Pittman and others
Defendant:
United States, Joseph R Biden, Department of Health and Human Services and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Bartels v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv00867
Plaintiff:
Katlyn Bartels
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Bartell v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2020cv00538
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc
Plaintiff:
Allen Bartell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bartel v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00069
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Henry Bartel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bartell v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2019cv02961
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Plaintiff:
Shannon Bartell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Texaco Inc. v. Bartel, et al.,
as 1:2018cv02126
Plaintiff:
Texaco Inc.
Defendant:
David C. Peebles and Willard E. Bartel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Winn v. Nyzc et al
as 1:2017cv01282
Plaintiff:
Antoine Winn
Defendant:
Matthew Nyzc, Gary Bartell, John L. Vinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv01179
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
