Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Leguire v. City of Findlay et al
as 3:2023cv01123
Plaintiff:
Matthias Leguire
Defendant:
The City of Findlay, Mayor Christina Muryn, Donald Rasmussen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04485
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00717
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Bauman v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2022cv02940
Plaintiff:
Susan Bauman
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Martens v. City of Findlay et al
as 3:2022cv00914
Defendant:
Robison, Curphey & O'Connell, LLC, Corey L. Tomlinson, City of Findlay and others
Plaintiff:
George Martens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Rainey v. Perkins Township Board of Trustees et al
as 3:2022cv00042
Plaintiff:
Dannie Rainey
Defendant:
Perkins Township Board of Trustees, Perkins Township Police Department, Joseph Bauman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Batton v. Ohio et al
as 3:2021cv01771
Plaintiff:
SARA BATTON
Defendant:
SANDUSKY COUNTY OHIO, SANDUSKY COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, SANDUSKY COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bauman v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00370
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and CR Bard
Plaintiff:
Marie T Bauman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bauman v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv04376
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Charles Bauman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bauman et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv01856
Plaintiff:
Blaque Bauman and Joan Bauman
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
