Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 Cases
Almont Ambulatory Surgery Cent, et al v. UnitedHealth Group, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-55301
Plaintiff - Appellant: ALMONT AMBULATORY SURGERY CENTER, LLC, a California limited liability company, BAKERFIELD SURGERY INSTITUTE, LLC, a California limited liability company, CIRO SURGERY CENTER, LLC, a California limited liability company and others
Defendant - Appellee: UNITEDHEALTH GROUP, INC., UNITED HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC., UNITEDHEALTHCARE INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Gill v. Bausch & Lomb Supplemental
as 14-1058
Plaintiff - Appellee: Daniel E. Gill, Thomas C. McDermott and Jay T. Holmes
Defendant - Appellant: Bausch & Lomb Supplemental Retirement Income Plan I, Bausch & Lomb Incorporated and Compensation Committee of the Bausch & Lomb Board of Directors
Connolly v. Aetna Life Insurance Company et al
as 3:2013cv01497
Plaintiff: Jeanne Connolly
Defendant: Aetna Life Insurance Company and Bausch & Lomb Disability Benefits Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Connolly v. Aetna Life Insurance Company et al
as 3:2010cv02240
Plaintiff: Jeanne Connolly
Defendant: Aetna Life Insurance Company, Bausch & Lomb Disability Benefits Plan and Bausch & Lomb, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
Gill et al v. Bausch & Lomb Supplemental Retirement Income Plan I et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2009cv06043
Plaintiff: Daniel E. Gill, Daniel E. Gill, Thomas C. McDermott and others
Defendant: Bausch & Lomb Supplemental Retirement Income Plan I, Bausch & Lomb Incorporated and Compensation Committee of the Bausch & Lomb Board of Directors
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor None
Butler v. Bausch & Lomb Disability Beenefits Plan
as 6:2007cv01169
Plaintiff: Ray Butler
Defendant: Bausch & Lomb Disability Beenefits Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?