Cases filed in Oregon
Lewis v. Bearden et al
as 3:2016cv02033
Respondent: Judge Bearden, Board of Parole, Jamiel Brown and others
Petitioner: James Ramon Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bearden v. Commissioner Social Security Administration We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2015cv00475
Plaintiff: Matthew L. Bearden
Defendant: Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv00554
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00458
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Westcott v. Sabri et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2012cv00018
Defendant: Theresa Arendell, Mary Ann Bearden, Tasha Black and others
Plaintiff: Sean Gordon Westcott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dawson v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2009cv01198
Petitioner: Craig Thomas Dawson
Respondent: State of Oregon, Doug Harcelrod and Mary Ann Bearden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Shen et al
as 3:2009cv00079
Plaintiff: Clarence Allen Jones
Defendant: Dennis Shen, Frank L Bearden, Doty Sever and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bearden v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 6:2007cv06199
Plaintiff: Debrah I. Bearden
Defendant: Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Shevchynski v. Velure et al
as 6:2007cv06077
Plaintiff: Nick Shevchynski
Defendant: Lyle Velure, Maurice Merten, Douglas Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?