Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Beasley v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2023cv00105
Plaintiff:
Mark E. Beasley
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
GS Farms LLC et al v. Prolific Farms, LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00502
Plaintiff:
GS Farms LLC and GCI Management LLC
Defendant:
Prolific Farms, LLC and Ryan Beasley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00246
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv01179
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Zoellner et al v. Bynum et al
as 4:2020cv00410
Defendant:
Bruce Dart, Tulsa Department of Health, The, City of Tulsa, The and others
Plaintiff:
James J DeCristofaro, Clay Clark, Robert Zoellner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Beasley v. Swift Transportation Co of Arizona Inc et al
as 5:2019cv00086
Defendant:
Mohave Transportation Insurance Company, Ibrahim Mamo and Swift Transportation Co of Arizona Inc
Plaintiff:
John Calvin Beasley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States of America v. Beasley et al
as 6:2017cv00379
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Steve D. Beasley, Sherry L. Beasley, Pontotoc County Board of County Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Bess-Beasley v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2017cv00358
Plaintiff:
Demornai T. Bess-Beasley
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Harjo v. Oklahoma City City of et al
as 5:2015cv01023
Plaintiff:
Tim Harjo
Defendant:
Oklahoma City City of , Jonathan Beasley and Jeremiah Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
McWilliams et al v. Sandridge Energy Inc et al
as 5:2015cv01001
Plaintiff:
Richard A McWilliams
Defendant:
Sandridge Energy Inc, Tom L Ward, Stephen C Beasley and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
