Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv14526
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Fleming v. Avis Budget et al
as 1:2022cv04463
Plaintiff:
Beatrice Fleming
Defendant:
Avis Budget, CNA Insurance Company, Peter Stavropolous and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Sexton et al
as 3:2020cv03039
Defendant:
Brent Keele, Todd Sexton, Beatrice Calhoun and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv08467
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Odeh v. Cook County et al
as 1:2018cv08170
Defendant:
Tanetta Pryor-Ramsey, Tameka Smith, Channel Fuller and others
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Odeh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberson, as Independent Administrator of the Estate of JEMEL ROBERSON v. Officer John Doe et al
as 1:2018cv07476
Defendant:
Officer John Doe and The Village of Midlothian
Plaintiff:
Beatrice Roberson, as Independent Administrator of the Estate of JEMEL ROBERSON and Beatrice Roberson
Respondent:
Illinois State Police
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HEILMAN v. BURKE et al
as 3:2018cv03259
Defendant:
JOSH EDWARDS, ANNETTE VEECH, RACHELLE AIKEN and others
Plaintiff:
HALEY HEILMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reddic v. Dimas et al
as 3:2018cv50043
Plaintiff:
Dorothy L. Reddic
Defendant:
James T. Dimas, Bruce Rauner, State of Illinois Department of Human Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Fleming v. Huesbch
as 1:2017cv00209
Plaintiff:
Beatrice Fleming
Defendant:
Jeffrey Huesbch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Jokines et al
as 1:2016cv09656
Plaintiff:
George R. Washington, Jr.
Defendant:
Beatrice D. Jokines, Shelly Washington, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
