Cases 11 - 20 of 47
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv17057
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv17057
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Christine Alire, et al v. The Gap, Inc., et al
as 21-55752
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CHRISTINE ALIRE
Plaintiff:
SHADI HAYDEN, JERRY HO, WILLIAM HANNUM and others
Defendant / Appellant:
THE GAP, INC.
Defendant:
THE RETAIL EQUATION, INC., SEPHORA USA, INC., ADVANCE AUTO PARTS and others
Richards Clearview, L.L.C. v. Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc.
as 20-30614
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Richards Clearview, L.L.C.
Defendant / Appellee:
Bed Bath & Beyond, Incorporated
Jaison Cianelli v. Nourison Industries Inc, et al
as 20-2910
Defendant / Appellee:
NOURISON INDUSTRIES INC, KOHLS CORP, QVC INC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAISON CIANELLI
MANTIA v. FLEMING et al
as 2:2020cv09763
Defendant:
VIRGINIA P. RUESTERHOLZ, JOHNATHAN B. OSBORNE, MARK J. TRITTON and others
Plaintiff:
GREG MANTIA
GROOMS v. TRITTON et al
as 2:2020cv09610
Defendant:
HARRIET EDELMAN, HARSHA RAMALINGAM, STEPHANIE BELL-ROSE and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN GROOMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
IN RE BED BATH & BEYOND STOCKHOLDER DERIVATIVE LITIGATION
as 2:2020cv08673
Defendant:
VIRGINIA P. RUESTERHOLZ, JOHNATHAN B. OSBORNE, HARRIET EDELMAN and others
Plaintiff:
OLUFEMI SALU
Consolidated Plaintiff:
KEVIN GROOMS and GREG MANTIA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv01203
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
KIRKLAND v. BED BATH & BEYOND INC. et al
as 2:2020cv05339
Defendant:
MARY A. WINSTON, MARK J TRITTON, BED BATH & BEYOND INC. and others
Plaintiff:
JERRY KIRKLAND
Petitioner:
SHAWN RUEBUSH and Kavin Bakhda
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
