Cases 1 - 10 of 141
Stripling v. Regalado et al
as 4:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Michael Stripling
Defendant:
Vic Regalado, Chaplin Bell and Smiley Elmore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell (PS) v. No Named Respondent
as 1:2024cv00694
Petitioner:
Keevin Bell, II
Respondent:
No Named Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lopez v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00217
Plaintiff:
Michael Lopez
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Alisha Tafoya-Lucero, Secretary of Corrections, Hope Salazar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hopper v. County of Tulsa et al
as 4:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Keith-Dewane Hopper
Defendant:
County of Tulsa, Vic Regalado, S Holloway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grissom (ID 33728) v. Bell et al
as 5:2023cv03260
Plaintiff:
Richard Grissom
Defendant:
Jordan Bell, Daniel Schnurr, Joel Hrabe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. United States
as 23-5126
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL DEWAYNE BELL
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Bell v. Nelson
as 5:2023cv01027
Plaintiff:
Michael Bell
Defendant:
LT FNU Nelson and FNU Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barnett v. Regalado et al
as 4:2023cv00445
Plaintiff:
Christopher J Barnett, Christopher J Magnum and Chris Mangum
Defendant:
Vic Regalado, Chaplin Bell, Chaplin Smiley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ferrell (PS) v. Joseph Bell and Others/Sheriff Deputies
as 1:2023cv01958
Plaintiff:
Dennis Ferrell
Defendant:
No Named Defendant, Joseph Bell, Others and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Bell
as 23-5050
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL DEWAYNE BELL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
