Cases 21 - 30 of 1,646
Pacific Bell Telephone Company v. Jones
as 2:2023mc00425
Petitioner:
Pacific Bell Telephone Company
Respondent:
Seth Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Pacific Bell Telephone Company v. Marine Taxonomic Services, Ltd.
as 2:2023mc00424
Respondent:
Marine Taxonomic Services, Ltd.
Petitioner:
Pacific Bell Telephone Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Enforcement of Administrative Subpoena
(SS) Bell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv02895
Plaintiff:
Kwame John Bell
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Pacific Bell Telephone Co. v. Roseburg Forest Products Co.
as 2:2023cv02892
Plaintiff:
Pacific Bell Telephone Company
Defendant:
Roseburg Forest Products Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv10349
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv10002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Randle v. Bell et al
as 3:2023cv05801
Plaintiff:
Ramello Randle
Defendant:
Kevin Bell, Diana Bectore, Derek Butts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Juan Ramos v. Bell Gardens Police Department et al
as 2:2023cv08958
Plaintiff:
Juan Ramos
Defendant:
Bell Gardens Police Department, R. Catani, D. Salmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pacific Bell Telephone Company v. Jones
as 3:2023cv01905
Respondent:
Seth Jones
Petitioner:
Pacific Bell Telephone Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
(PC)Ramos v. Bell Garden's Police Department et al
as 1:2023cv01487
Plaintiff:
Juan Ramos
Defendant:
Bell Garden's Police Department, R. Catani, D. Salmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
