Cases 1 - 10 of 28
DeAndre Harris v. Matt Macauley
as 24-1060
Petitioner:
DEANDRE HARRIS
Respondent:
MATT MACAULEY, Warden, Bellamy Creek Correctional Facility
Robert Price v. MDOC, et al
as 24-1062
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JOSEPH-LEWIS PRICE
Defendant:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ST. LOUIS CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, JOHN CHRISTIANSEN, Warden and others
Robert Pann v. Brian Hadden, et al
as 23-2014
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT WILLIAM PANN
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN HADDEN, KAYLA JOHNSON, K. CHAUVEZ and others
Price v. Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv11872
Plaintiff:
Robert Joseph Lewis Price
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, St. Louis Central Michigan Correctional Facility and Bellamy Creek Correctional Facility
Pann #254048 v. Hadden et al
as 1:2022cv00076
Plaintiff:
Robert Pann #254048
Defendant:
B. Hadden, K. Johnson, K. Chauvez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beverly v Trierweiler
as 2:2018cv13837
Plaintiff:
Bellamy Creek Correctional Facility and Tony Trierweiler
Petitioner:
Emmanuel Beverly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Wallace #349628 v. Fleck et al
as 1:2018cv01343
Defendant:
Brent Fleck, Bellamy Creek Correctional Facility and Tony Trierweiler
Plaintiff:
Marcus Lorenzo Wallace #349628
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wallace v. Fleck et al
as 2:2018cv13674
Plaintiff:
Marcus Lorenzo Wallace
Defendant:
Brent Fleck, Bellamy Creek Correctional Facility and Tony Trierweiler
LeBlanc v. Kalamazoo Police Department et al
as 1:2018cv00487
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey R. LeBlanc #333019
Defendant:
Kalamazoo Police Department, Kalamazoo County Sheriff, Kalamazoo, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGore #142739 v. Trinity Food Group et al
as 2:2017cv00195
Plaintiff:
Darryl McGore #142739
Defendant:
Trinity Food Group, Unknown Buschard, Daniel Lesatz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
