Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Park Employees and Retirement, et alIn re: Park Employees and Retirement, et al
as 21-1386
Respondent:
RAJIV KANISHKA LIYANAARCHIE DE SILVA, BUCKS COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FUND, SUKETU P. UPADHYAY and others
Petitioner:
BLEICHMAR FONTI & AULD LLP and In re: PARK EMPLOYEES AND RETIREMENT BOARD EMPLOYEES ANNUITY AND BENEFIT FUND OF CHICAGO
Park Employees' and Retirement Board Employees' Annuity and Benefit Fund of Chicago v. Endo International PLC et al
as 2:2020cv06103
Plaintiff:
Park Employees' and Retirement Board Employees' Annuity and Benefit Fund of Chicago
Defendant:
PAUL V. CAMPANELLI, Rajiv De Silva, Suketu upadhyay and others
Pelletier et al v. Endo International PLC et al
as 2:2020cv05263
Defendant:
RAJIV KANISHKA LIYANAARCHCHIE DE SILVA, ENDO INTERNATIONAL PLC, PAUL V. CAMPANELLI and others
Plaintiff:
Fernando Inzunza, Benefit Fund of Chicago, Park Employees' and Retirement Board Employees' Annuity and Benefit Fund of Chicago and others
Park Employees' and Retirement Board Employees' Annuity and Benefit Fund of Chicago v. Endo International PLC et al
as 2:2020mc00103
Plaintiff:
Park Employees' and Retirement Board Employees' Annuity and Benefit Fund of Chicago
Defendant:
RAJIV KANISHKA LIYANAARCHIE DE SILVA, SUKETU P. UPADHYAY, ENDO INTERNATIONAL PLC and others
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Park Employees' and Retirement Board Employees' Annuity and Benefit Fund of Chicago v. Endo International PLC et al
as 2:2020mc00102
Plaintiff:
Park Employees' and Retirement Board Employees' Annuity and Benefit Fund of Chicago
Defendant:
RAJIV KANISHKA LIYANAARCHIE DE SILVA, SUKETU P. UPADHYAY, ENDO INTERNATIONAL PLC and others
Lord Abbett Affiliated Fund, Inc., et al v. Navient Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv00112
Defendant:
Navient Corporation, Barry A. Munitz, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Policemen's Annuity & Benefit Fund of Chicago, George A. Menold, Lord Abbett Equity Trust - Lord Abbett Calibrated Mid Cap Value Fund and others
Petitioner:
Employees' Retirement System of the City of Providence, Boilermaker-Blacksmith National Pension Trust and The City of Miami Fire Fighters' and Police Officers' Retirement Trust
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 78
In Re: Daimler, et al, et al
as 05-2482
Plaintiff:
STANLEY P. KOPS, P.C. 401(K) PROFIT SHARING PLAN, on behalf of itself and all similarly situated persons, DENVER EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT PLAN, POLICEMENS ANNUITY AND BENEFIT FUND OF CHICAGO and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
TRACINDA CORP, a Nevada corporation
Defendant / Appellant:
DAIMLERCHRYSLER AG, a Federal Republic of Germany corporation, DAIMLER BENZ AG, a Federal Republic of Germany corporation, JURGEN SCHREMPP, a citizen of the Federal Republic of Germany and others
Defendant / Appellee:
HILMAR KOPPER, a citizen of the Federal Republic of Germany
In Re: Daimler, et al, et al
as 05-2363
Plaintiff:
STANLEY P. KOPS, P.C. 401(K) PROFIT SHARING PLAN, on behalf of itself and all similarly situated persons, DENVER EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT PLAN, POLICEMENS ANNUITY AND BENEFIT FUND OF CHICAGO and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TRACINDA CORP, a Nevada corporation
Defendant / Appellee:
DAIMLERCHRYSLER AG, a Federal Republic of Germany corporation, DAIMLER BENZ AG, a Federal Republic of Germany corporation, JURGEN SCHREMPP, a citizen of the Federal Republic of Germany and others
In Re: DaimlerChrysler, et al v. , et al
as 1:2000cv00993
Plaintiff:
Stanley P. Kops, P.C., 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan, Denver Employees Retirement Plan, Policemen's Annuity and Benefit Fund of Chicago and others
Defendant:
DaimlerChrysler AG, Daimler-Benz AG, Juergen Schrempp and others
Petitioner:
Roger Heymann, Kornitzer Capital Management, Leon S. Buchka and others
Tracinda Corporation v. DaimlerChrysler AG, et al
as 1:2000cv00984
Plaintiff:
Tracinda Corporation
Defendant:
DaimlerChrysler AG, Daimler-Benz AG, Juergen Schrempp and others
Petitioner:
Florida State Board of Administration, Policemen's Annuity and Benefit Fund of Chicago, Municipal Employees Annuity and Benefit Fund of Chicago and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
