Cases 41 - 50 of 141
Rosenberg et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2020cv03911
Defendant:
Robert Kselman, John & Jane Does 1-30, Eugene Porcaro and others
Plaintiff:
Eltha Jordan, Rudy Rosenberg and Jacqueline Rosenberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sandstrom v. State of New York
as 20-1258
Defendant / Appellee:
Dave Mistretta, Chester Cobb, Jason Cresanti and others
Defendant:
State of New York
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dean J. Sandstrom
Bentley v. Annucci et al
as 1:2019cv01338
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, E. Lowerre and S. Eckert
Plaintiff:
Kevin M. Bentley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Forbes v. Searchfield
as 19-2424
Defendant / Appellee:
Jack Waugman, Jose A. Garcia, Tom Janus and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dennis Forbes
Bentley v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2019cv00739
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Melissa J Bentley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Weaver v. Warrington
as 19-1455
Defendant / Appellee:
City of New York Department of Education and Bentley Warrington
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lashana Weaver
Bentley v. State of New York
as 19-1266
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Robert Bentley
Defendant / Appellee:
State of New York
IN RE AT&T/DIRECTTV NOW SECURITIES LITIGATION
as 1:2019cv02892
Defendant:
Richard W. Fisher, Cynthia B. Taylor, John J. Stephens and others
Plaintiff:
Melvin Gross
Lead Plaintiff:
Evan Hassiotis, Martin J. Boot, Iron Workers Local 580 Joint Funds and others
Petitioner:
KBC Asset Management NV and Pro-Alpha Investments Limited
Sandstrom v. State of New York et al
as 1:2018cv01514
Defendant:
Chautaqua County, Jeffrey Hover, Chester Cobb and others
Plaintiff:
Dean J. Sandstrom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11795
Plaintiff:
Joyce Little, Estate of Fletcher Eberle, Nicholas Martino Jr. and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
