Cases 1 - 10 of 96
Zoe El v. Rojas et al
as 0:2024cv60454
Plaintiff:
Chris Zoe El
Defendant:
R. Rojas, Phoebee Rebecca Francois, Mindy F Soloman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Smith v. Lumpkin
as 24-20040
Petitioner:
Patrick Bernard Smith
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Smith v. Hopkins et al
as 1:2023cv00471
Plaintiff:
Patrick Bernard Smith
Defendant:
Terri Hopkins, Tonia Hopkins, Chris Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv04569
Petitioner:
Patrick Bernard Smith
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peralta v. Smith et al
as 1:2023cv08473
Plaintiff:
Olga Nayelin Peralta
Defendant:
Bernard Smith and JB Hunt Transport, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Espinal et al v. Smith et al
as 1:2023cv08161
Plaintiff:
Fiordaliza Espinal and Yuderka Zapata
Defendant:
Bernard Smith and JB Hunt Transport Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Smith v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv03518
Petitioner:
Rayford Bernard Smith
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
EL v. TM Central Courthouse et al
as 0:2023cv61613
Plaintiff:
Chriszoe EL
Defendant:
TM Central Courthouse, R. Rojas, Phoebee Rebecca Francois and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Smith v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv20265
Plaintiff:
Bernard Smith
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv16069
Plaintiff:
CLIFTON BERNARD SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
