Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Michael Dobson v. Dr. Thompson
as 24-6403
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DOBSON
Defendant:
DR. THOMPSON, HAROLD W. CLARKE, STEVEN HERRICK and others
Douglas Hoglan v. A. Robinson
as 22-7265
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DOUGLAS A. HOGLAN
Defendant / Appellee:
A. DAVID ROBINSON, Chief of Corrections Operations for VDOC, K. CROWDER-AUSTIN, Regional Ombudsman, ADINA L. POGUE, Western Region Operations Manager at VDOC and others
Defendant:
MARCUS ELAM, Regional Administrator and MELISSA WELCH, Operations Support Manager for VDOC
Sherman Brown v. Bernard Booker
as 22-6522
Petitioner / Appellant:
SHERMAN BROWN
Respondent / Appellee:
BERNARD W. BOOKER
Dobson v. Clarke et al
as 3:2022cv00132
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Dobson
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, David Robinson, Bernard W. Booker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sovereign v. Clarke et al
as 7:2021cv00449
Plaintiff:
Jonah Sovereign
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, A. David Robinson, Sharon Griggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jack Vigue v. Harold Clarke
as 21-6907
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD H. PENCE, Counselor, MAILROOM SUPERVISOR, GRIEVANCE COORDINATOR and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JACK RAY VIGUE
Michael Dobson v. Colin Stolle
as 21-6689
Defendant / Appellee:
MR. PHILIP WHITE, Assistant Warden Green Rock Corr. Center, COLIN DWYER STOLLE, Commowealth Attorney's Office of Virginia Beach, DEREK M. REED, Detective Virginia Beach Police Department and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL DOBSON
Estes Jennings v. Bernard Booker
as 19-7505
Petitioner / Appellant:
ESTES JENNINGS
Respondent / Appellee:
BERNARD W. BOOKER
David Potter v. Bernard Booker
as 19-7442
Respondent / Appellee:
BERNARD W. BOOKER, Warden Buckingham Correctional Center
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID A. POTTER
Harvey v. Booker
as 7:2019cv00596
Respondent:
Bernard W. Booker
Petitioner:
Raymond Louis Harvey, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
