Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Mason v. Birmingham Police Department et al
as 2:2023cv00666
Plaintiff:
James Mason
Defendant:
Birmingham Police Department and Bessemer Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson v. Bessemer Police Department et al
as 2:2021cv00439
Plaintiff:
Joseph C Robinson
Defendant:
Charles McKenna, Robbie Tackett, Bessemer Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Marcus Underwood v. City of Bessemer, The, et al
as 19-13992
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER ASARISI, individually and in his official capacity as a law enforcement officer of the City of Bessemer Police Department, DANIEL CECIL PARTRIDGE, individually and in his official capacity as a law enforcement officer for the City of Bessemer Police Department, CITY OF BESSEMER, THE, a municipality and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARCUS UNDERWOOD
Collier v. Bessemer, City of et al
as 2:2017cv00711
Plaintiff:
Bobby Collier
Defendant:
Bessemer, City of and Bessemer Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Bessemer, City of et al
as 2:2015cv01484
Plaintiff:
Donald Wilson
Defendant:
Bessemer, City of and Bessemer Police Department, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014mc02133
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Carmichael v. Personnel Board of Jefferson County, The et al
as 2:2011cv02424
Plaintiff:
Gary D Carmichael
Defendant:
Personnel Board of Jefferson County, The and Bessemer Police Department, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00919
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Cowlin v. Bessemer Police Department
as 2:2008cv02344
Plaintiff:
George Cowlin
Defendant:
Bessemer Police Department
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
