Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Best v. ASGDC- employees et al
as 1:2023cv05539
Plaintiff:
Paul R. Best, Jr. and Paul Rawling Best, Jr.
Defendant:
ASGDC- employees, Sgt. Sommers, c/o Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
McDuffie v. Best Buy Co., Inc et al
as 2:2021cv03641
Defendant:
City of Charleston Police Department, Best Buy Co., Inc doing business as Best Buy, Daniel Paul Regan and others
Plaintiff:
Stanton McDuffie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Best v. USA
as 4:2016cv01004
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Randal Deon Best
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Best v. USA
as 2:2015cv03469
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Christopher Best
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Watkins v. Cartlege et al
as 3:2013cv01129
Petitioner:
Robert Max Watkins
Respondent:
Leroy Cartlege, James M Dorriety, W Walter Wilkins, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chronister v. Byars et al
as 8:2012cv03348
Plaintiff:
Alan Dale Chronister
Defendant:
William Byars, Laverne Cohen, C A Burton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Coleman v. SCDC et al
as 1:2012cv02055
Plaintiff:
William T Coleman
Defendant:
SCDC, Bernard Mackey, Unknown SCDC Defendants and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frost v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2011cv02520
Plaintiff:
Robert Frost, Jr
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, Bill Byars, Levern Cohen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frost v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2011cv02520
Plaintiff:
Robert Frost, Jr
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections , Bill Byars , Levern Cohen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rainey v. Walker et al
as 9:2011cv02159
Plaintiff:
Christopher Allan Rainey
Defendant:
James E Walker and George Best
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
