Cases 21 - 30 of 48
McClay v. Shah et al
as 3:2016cv00019
Plaintiff:
Dwaine McClay
Defendant:
Vipen Shah, Wexford Medical Sources, Catina Food Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reeves v. Shah et al
as 3:2015cv01422
Defendant:
Vipen Shah, Suzann Bailey, Warden Lashbrook and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Reaves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hardy v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2015cv00437
Plaintiff:
Nedrick Jeffrey Hardy, Sr
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Pat Quinn, Salvador Godinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Harrington et al
as 3:2013cv00900
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Smith
Defendant:
Rick Harrington, Chief Administrative Officers, Betsy Spiller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCutcheon v. Schnicker et al
as 3:2013cv00779
Plaintiff:
John McCutcheon
Defendant:
Michael Schnicker, C/O Bethel, Lieutenant Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitfield v. Atchingson et al
as 3:2013cv00653
Plaintiff:
BenYehudah Whitfield
Defendant:
Michael Atchingson, Eric Althoff, Angie Blackman-Donnovan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burke v. Godinez et al
as 3:2013cv00345
Plaintiff:
Calvin Burke
Defendant:
Salvador Godinez, Rick Harrington, Assistant Warden Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gregory Turley v. Dave Rednour, et al
as 12-3630
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY J. TURLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVE REDNOUR, JEANETTE D. COWAN, BETSY SPILLER and others
Chester O'Quinn v. Dave Rednour, et al
as 12-2935
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHESTER O'QUINN
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVE REDNOUR, E. KAESBERG, Publication Review Officer, Menard CC, BETSY SPILLER, Case Worker, Menard CC and others
O'Quinn v. Rednour et al
as 3:2012cv00672
Plaintiff:
Chester O'Quinn
Defendant:
D Rednour, E Kaesberg, Betsy Spiller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
