Cases 41 - 50 of 96
WATKINS v. MACON BIBB COUNTY et al
as 5:2017cv00293
Defendant:
DAVID DAVIS, MACON BIBB COUNTY and CEDRIC PINSON
Plaintiff:
ERIC WATKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams v. MACON-BIBB COUNTY et al
as 5:2017cv00267
Defendant:
ALLEN KENDRICK, MACON BIBB COUNTY, MICHAEL KENIREY and others
Plaintiff:
DEVAN WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
REEVES V. KEY et al
as 5:2017cv00198
Plaintiff:
TRACY REEVES
Defendant:
RICHARD KEY and BIBB COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00075
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
NEWTON et al v. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING LLC et al
as 5:2017cv00002
Plaintiff:
DALE NEWTON, DORIS NEWTON, GENESIS INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES LLC and others
Defendant:
OCWEN LOAN SERVICING LLC, DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY, DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GRAY v. GEORGIA STATE OF et al
as 5:2016cv00406
Plaintiff:
NAPOLEON GRAY
Defendant:
GEORGIA STATE OF, NATHAN DEAL, SAMUEL OLENS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
GRAY vs GEORGIA STATE OF, et al.
as 5:2016cv00318
Plaintiff:
NAPOLEON GRAY
Defendant:
GEORGIA STATE OF, NATHAN DEAL, ROBERT REICHERT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryant Brinson v. Sharrell Lewis, et al
as 16-13644
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRYANT BRINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
SHARRELL LEWIS, In her Individual and Official Capacity, as a Bibb County Assistant Solicitor, MAURICE CLOWERS, in his Individual and Official Capacity and BIBB COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00213
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv00452
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
