Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Tucker v. Georgia State Patrol et al
as 2:2013cv00098
Plaintiff:
Robert Tucker
Defendant:
Georgia State Patrol, Neal Jump , Bill Hitchens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Victor Mason v. Kendall Swicord, et al
as 12-13667
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VICTOR MASON
Defendant - Appellee:
KENDALL BLAKE SWICORD, Georgia State Patrol, BILL HITCHENS, Commissioner, Georgia State Patrol, W. D. CHASTAIN, Commanding Officer, Georgia State Patrol and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv03261
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02032
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Type:
Civil Rights
Grier v. Georgia Department of Public Safety et al
as 5:2008cv00277
Plaintiff:
J'Mar Grier
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Public Safety, Georgia Department of Public Safety, Bill Hitchens and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv02828
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
White v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2007cv01739
Plaintiff:
Tonji White
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Sonny Perdue, Bill Hitchens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2007cv00075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2007cv00037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
