Cases 1 - 10 of 167
Stokes v. Collier et al
as 6:2017cv00373
Plaintiff:
David W Stokes
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Bill Pierce, Jeffery Catoe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garza v. Richy et al
as 6:2017cv00080
Plaintiff:
Rosfel Garza
Defendant:
Linda Richy, Bill Pierce, John Rupert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoover v. Collier et al
as 4:2016cv01632
Plaintiff:
Brian Hoover
Defendant:
Bryan Collier and Bill Pierce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Moore et al
as 1:2015cv00210
Plaintiff:
Ivy Lee Green
Defendant:
Rocky Moore, Christopher Escobar, Sammy Doolittle, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wagner v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 1:2015cv00177
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Wagner
Respondent:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Texas Criminal Justice Board, Oliver Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wagner v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 6:2015cv00276
Defendant:
Stanley J. Baldwin, Oliver Bell, Richard Burgess and others
Plaintiff:
Mitchell W. Wagner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brashear v. Lyles et al
as 4:2015cv00589
Plaintiff:
Chris Alan Brashear
Defendant:
Thomas Lyles, Vance Drum, Bill Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoover v. Collier et al
as 1:2015cv00039
Plaintiff:
Brian Hoover
Defendant:
Bryan Collier and Bill Pierce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franklin et al v. Whitfield et al
as 4:2014cv00065
Defendant:
Unit Capt. Kevin Blackshear, Roger Bowers, Unit Major Kimberly Garza and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick D. Franklin, Andrew D. McGrew, Jr., Stephen Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tucker v. Livingston et al
as 6:2014cv00659
Plaintiff:
George Lee Tucker, II
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, John A Rupert, Bill Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
