Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Carey v. Walker et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2017cv00227
Plaintiff:
Carlos Carey
Defendant:
Cliff Walker, Robert Longshore and Bill Wynne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nellon v. Bentley et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00824
Plaintiff:
Prince Nellon
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Wallace Capel, Jr., Bill Wynne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nellon v. Bentley et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00646
Plaintiff:
Prince Nellon
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Mike Hubbard, Jefferson S. Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCrary v. Bentley et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2016cv00645
Plaintiff:
Frankie McCrary
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Mike Hubbard, Wanda Lightner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coker v. State of Alabama et al
as 5:2016cv00891
Plaintiff:
Larry G Coker
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Alabama Department of Corrections, Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles, The and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Kilby Correctional Facility et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2015cv00729
Plaintiff:
Ronnie V. Williams
Defendant:
Kilby Correctional Facility, Central Records Review Board, Board of Pardon and Paroles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Radford v. Dunn et al
as 1:2015cv00396
Plaintiff:
Thomas Radford
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn, Robert Bentley, Robert Brantley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Dillard et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2015cv00209
Plaintiff:
Arnetra Smith
Defendant:
Cynthia Dillard, Donald Campbell, Bill Wynne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miles v. Alabama Board of Pardon and Paroles et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2014cv01262
Plaintiff:
Michael Shane Miles
Defendant:
Alabama Board of Pardon and Paroles, Kim Thomas, Robert P. Longshore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry v. Wynn et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2014cv00992
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lee Perry
Defendant:
Bill Wynn, Cliff Walker, Robert Longshore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
