Cases 11 - 20 of 56
BRETT v. D'ANDREA et al
as 3:2018cv14525
Defendant:
HASEEN CRITTERDON, CORY BOOKER, JOE ARYCE and others
Plaintiff:
FRANK BRETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
BRETT v. SAMSON, et als
as 2:2018cv12908
Defendant:
WOLF AND SAMSON, JOE ANDEE BANU, JOHN MORGAN and others
Plaintiff:
FRANK BRETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRETT v. SAMSON, et als
as 3:2018cv12908
Defendant:
WOLF AND SAMSON, JOE ANDEE BANU, JOHN MORGAN and others
Plaintiff:
FRANK BRETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BALDEO et al v. CITY OF PATERSON et al
as 2:2018cv05359
Plaintiff:
STACEY BALDEO and SIRRANO KEITH BALDEO
Defendant:
COUNCILMAN MOHAMMED AKHTARUZZAMAN, COUNCILMAN MICHAEL MIKE JACKSON, COUNCILMAN LUIS VELEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JEFFERSON v. ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL et al
as 3:2018cv00477
Plaintiff:
LISA JEFFERSON
Defendant:
ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL and BILL MAYS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRETT v. MENENDEZ et al
as 3:2017cv09457
Plaintiff:
FRANK BRETT
Defendant:
ROBERT MENENDEZ, SOLOMON MELGIN, PAUL MARSELLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRETT v. CHRISTIE et al
as 3:2017cv06176
Plaintiff:
FRANK BRETT
Defendant:
CHRIS CHRISTIE, DAVID SAMSON, DAVID WILDSTEIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
COHEN-JOHNSON et al v. MALATESTA et al
as 3:2017cv05773
Plaintiff:
HELENA COHEN-JOHNSON and JAMES JOHNSON
Defendant:
TONY MALATESTA , ANTHONY FANATASIA , WALTER AKSTULEWICZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv05261
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
STEINHARDT v. BERNARDVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 3:2017cv02169
Plaintiff:
ANNETTE L. STEINHARDT
Defendant:
BERNARDVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, KEVIN VALENTINE, BRIAN KELLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
