Cases 1 - 10 of 292
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Rich v. Ceiss et al
as 5:2024cv00205
Plaintiff:
JT Rich
Defendant:
Cortnie Ciess, Jerry Hurburger, Cheyenne Underwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Community Health Development Partners LLC et al v. Osborne et al
as 5:2024cv00295
Plaintiff:
Community Health Development Partners LLC, CHDP Lake Havasu LLC, CHDP Pahrump LLC and others
Defendant:
Chris E Osborne, Taylor Horst and Bill Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Wrenn v. Oklahoma Office of the Attorney General et al
as 5:2024cv00230
Plaintiff:
Darrick Edward Wrenn
Defendant:
Oklahoma Office of the Attorney General, Scott Pruitt, Mike Hunter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lietzke v. Birmingham City of et al
as 5:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
Birmingham City of and Patrick D Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lietzke v. Montgomery County of et al
as 5:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
Montgomery County of, Reese McKinney and DT Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lietzke v. Greyhound Lines Inc
as 5:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
Greyhound Lines Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Lietzke v. Montgomery City of et al
as 5:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
Montgomery City of and Kevin Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lietzke v. Montgomery City of et al
as 5:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
Montgomery City of and Kevin Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lietzke v. Montgomery City of et al
as 5:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
Montgomery City of and Kevin Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
