Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Horowitz et al v. Lindenbach; et al.
as 1:2012cv00205
Defendant:
Sheryle Sultan, Alma C. Ott, Peter J Boundreau and others
Plaintiff:
Leonard G. Horowitz and Sherri Kane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal Libel,Assault,Slander
Pitts v. Rushing et al
as 1:2011cv00280
Plaintiff:
Joseph C. Pitts
Defendant:
Bill Rushing, Johnston and Ted Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ford Island Housing, LLC v. Energy Billing Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00552
Plaintiff:
Ford Island Housing, LLC
Defendant:
Energy Billing Systems, Inc. , Yardi Systems, Inc. , Doe Persons 1-50 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00363
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Royal Travel, Inc. v. Shell Management Hawaii Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00314
Plaintiff:
Royal Travel, Inc., Royal Travel, Inc. and Royal Travel, Inc.
Defendant:
Shell Management Hawaii Inc., Robert H. Evans, Bill Matthews and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Kamaole Pointe Development LP et al v. County of Maui et al
as 1:2007cv00447
Plaintiff:
Kamaole Pointe Development LP, Kamaole Pointe Development LP, Kamaole Pointe Development LP and others
Defendant:
County of Maui, G. Riki Hokama, Danny A. Mateo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nakayama v. Murray et al
as 1:2007cv00316
Plaintiff:
Kevin Nakayama
Defendant:
David Murray, Pemela Meyers, Bill Rushing and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
v. Nakayama et al
as 1:2007cv00317
Plaintiff:
Kevin Nakayama
Defendant:
Bill Rushing, Morillo and Stacy Val Kanehailua
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nakayama v. Manumaleuna et al
as 1:2007cv00026
Petitioner:
Kevin Nakayama
Respondent:
John Manumaleuna, Nolan Espinda and Bill Rushing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
