Cases 31 - 40 of 129
Wallace v. Mitchem et al
as 2:2011cv02907
Petitioner:
Andre Lynell Wallace
Respondent:
Billy Mitchem and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Martinez v. Mitchem et al (INMATE3)
as 1:2011cv00667
Plaintiff:
George Fidel Martinez
Defendant:
Billy Mitchem and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Santos v. Mitchem et al
as 7:2011cv02666
Plaintiff:
Nedolandez Santos
Defendant:
Billy Mitchem, Patric and Robinson
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sunday v. Mitchem et al (INMATE1)
as 3:2011cv00544
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lee Sunday
Defendant:
Billy Mitchem and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Keenum v. Mitchem et al
as 5:2011cv02460
Petitioner:
Douglas Louis Keenum
Respondent:
Billy Mitchem and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Roby v. Mitchem et al
as 2:2011cv02197
Petitioner:
Warren Lee Roby
Respondent:
Billy . Mitchem and Attorney General of the State of ALabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Reed v. Correctional Medical Services et al
as 5:2011cv02184
Plaintiff:
Lester Carpenter Reed
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Ruth Naglich, Billy Mitchem and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watkins v. Mitchem et al
as 5:2011cv01528
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Watkins
Defendant:
Billy Mitchem, Lloyd Wallace, Derwin Halbrooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gillentine v. Mitchem
as 6:2011cv01316
Petitioner:
Tommy James Gillentine
Respondent:
Billy Mitchem and Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Morris v. Mitchem et al
as 5:2011cv01129
Petitioner:
James Earl Morris
Respondent:
Billy Mitchem and Attorney General of State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
