Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Knight v. Thomas et al
as 5:2014cv02373
Plaintiff:
Tommy James Knight
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas, . Page, Imbody and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hatcher v. Bentley et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv00348
Plaintiff:
Ronald Lee Hatcher
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Kim Tobias Thomas, James Deloach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cannon v. Mitchem et al
as 5:2013cv01299
Plaintiff:
Roy Michael Cannon
Defendant:
Billy Mitchem and Hunt
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clegg v. Thomas et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00283
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Scott Clegg
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas, Grant Culliver, Dewayne Estes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charest v. Mitchem et al
as 2:2012cv02844
Petitioner:
Patrick Joseph Charest
Respondent:
Billy . Mitchem , D Hunt, Stacy Lee George and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Seals v. Alabama, State of et al
as 5:2012cv02751
Plaintiff:
Gary Seals, Jr
Defendant:
Alabama, State of, Department of Corrections, Jerrydean Cunningham and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ricky Knight, et al v. Leslie Thompson, et al
as 12-11926
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKY KNIGHT, FRANKLIN IRVIN, TIMOTHY GRAY WOLF SMITH and others
Defendant - Appellee:
LESLIE THOMPSON, DONALD PARKER, CHAPLIN and others
:
SERVICE
McBee v. Mitchem et al
as 5:2012cv01029
Plaintiff:
Jerry Randolph McBee
Defendant:
Billy Mitchem, Jimmy Patrick, Dorthy Goode and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duncan v. Thomas et al
as 5:2011cv03667
Plaintiff:
Joe C Duncan, Jr
Defendant:
Kim Thomas and Billy Mitchem
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed v. Correctional Medical Services et al
as 5:2011cv02184
Plaintiff:
Lester Carpenter Reed
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Ruth Naglich, Billy Mitchem and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
