Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 145
Clemons v. Mitchem et al
as 5:2008cv00273
Petitioner: Michael A Clemons
Respondent: Billy Mitchem and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pruitt v. Mitchem et al
as 4:2008cv01046
Petitioner: Stacy Ramon Pruitt
Respondent: Billy Mitchem and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Pride v. Mitchem et al
as 5:2008cv01195
Petitioner: June Allen Pride
Respondent: Billy Mitchem and Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Massey v. Mitchem
as 1:2007cv00664
Petitioner: Jim Edward Massey
Respondent: Billy Mitchem
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bill Kemp v. Billy Mitchem
as 10-11386
Petitioner - Appellant: BRIAN KEMP
Respondent - Appellee: BILLY MITCHEM
Tommy Knight v. Billy Mitchem, et al
as 10-15808
Petitioner - Appellant: TOMMY JAMES KNIGHT
Respondent - Appellee: BILLY MITCHEM, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Pride v. Mitchem et al
as 5:2009cv02607
Petitioner: Dylan Cordell Pride
Defendant: Billy Mitchem
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Seals v. Alabama, State of et al
as 5:2012cv02751
Defendant: Richard Allen, Kim Thomas, James Smith and others
Plaintiff: Gary Seals, Jr
Miscellaneou: staff attorney
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Reeves v. Mitchem et al
as 1:2007cv02178
Petitioner: Randy Antonio Reeves
Respondent: Billy Mitchem and Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Benjamin Patterson v. Warden Billy Mitchem, et al
as 10-11561
Petitioner - Appellant: BENJAMIN CHADWICK PATTERSON
Respondent - Appellee: BILLY MITCHEM and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ALABAMA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?