Cases 31 - 40 of 56
Murray v. Birmingham Board of Education et al
as 2:2013cv00822
Plaintiff:
Tommy Murray , Daryl Carr , Shirley Pritchett and others
Defendant:
Birmingham Board of Education, Tyrone Belcher, Sr, Virginia Volker and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv04068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
KD v. Wooten et al
as 2:2012cv02734
Plaintiff:
KD
Defendant:
Michael Wayne Wooten, Aaron Moyana , Birmingham City Schools and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Banks et al v. Birmingham Board of Education
as 2:2012cv01682
Plaintiff:
Eleazier Banks , Carley Dawson , Peggy Lewis and others
Defendant:
Birmingham Board of Education
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv04052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv03487
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv02843
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Crosby v. Birmingham Board of Education
as 2:2011cv01536
Plaintiff:
Beverly Crosby , Delores Kinniebrew , Linda Mosely and others
Defendant:
Birmingham Board of Education
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01352
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Sher v. Birmingham Board of Education
as 2:2010cv03499
Plaintiff:
Ina-Mae Sher
Defendant:
Birmingham Board of Education
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
