Cases 41 - 50 of 650
Black v. Johnson et al
as 4:2023cv02946
Plaintiff:
J.B. Black
Defendant:
Judge Robert Johnson, Judge Hazel B Jones and Attorney Jerome Godinich Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Ancrum v. Lyft Inc et al
as 3:2023cv01740
Plaintiff:
Mattie Rachelle Ancrum
Defendant:
Lyft, Inc. d/b/a Lyft Drives Texas, Inc., Lyft Center, Inc., Dartanyan Jamerson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Black v. Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing
as 4:2023cv02783
Plaintiff:
JB Black
Defendant:
Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Black v. Gonzales
as 4:2023cv02487
Petitioner:
J.B. Black
Respondent:
Ed Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Black v. Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing et al
as 4:2023cv02343
Defendant:
J.B. Black, Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing, Wilmington Saving Fund Society, FSB and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Black v. Jones
as 4:2023cv02379
Plaintiff:
J.B. Black
Defendant:
Hazel B Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Francis v Black Rose Specialized Transport LLC
as 1:2023cv00143
Plaintiff:
Carl Lee Francis and Carl L Francis
Defendant:
Black Rose Specialized Transport LLC, Kory Dwyer and Darius L. Magrum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Brooks v. Hiney et al
as 4:2023cv01888
Plaintiff:
Roderick A. Brooks
Defendant:
Lucas Hiney, Major Garrett Simmons, Donna Black and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Culver et al
as 4:2023cv01887
Plaintiff:
Roderick A. Brooks
Defendant:
Daniel Culver, Major Garrett Simmons, Donna Black and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lister v. Shinette et al
as 4:2023cv01854
Plaintiff:
Oliver Eshman Lister, II
Defendant:
Sergeant Shamus M. Shinette, Sergeant William B. Burlin, Ofc. Abdul Suleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
