Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Blacklock (ID 101194) v. Schnurr
as 5:2023cv03253
Petitioner:
Christopher K. Blacklock
Respondent:
Kansas, State of and Dan Schnurr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BLACKLOCK v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv11440
Plaintiff:
CODI DANIEL BLACKLOCK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Norman v. US Attorney General
as 23-50360
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Anthony Norman
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. Attorney General, for the Western District of Texas, Kim Ogg, District Attorney, Harris County, Glenn Hegar, Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts and others
Blacklock v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv00779
Petitioner:
Charles Ray Blacklock
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Blacklock v. Harris County
as 4:2022cv03632
Plaintiff:
Charles Ray Blacklock
Defendant:
Harris County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Louis Abramson et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv05041
Plaintiff:
Lisa Brown, Louis Abramson, John Ackley and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Abramson et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00833
Plaintiff:
Lisa Brown, Louis Abramson, John Ackley and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Abramson et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00833
Plaintiff:
Abramson, Lisa Brown, Louis Abramson and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Blacklock v. Collier
as 4:2022cv00975
Petitioner:
Charles Ray Blacklock
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Bryan Collier and Bobby Lumpkin, Director, TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Norman v. U.S. Attorney General et al
as 1:2021cv01024
Defendant:
Thompson Prometric, U.S. Attorney General, Kim Ogg and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Norman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
