Cases 21 - 30 of 38
Scruggs v. Dorning et al
as 5:2011cv01514
Plaintiff:
Rickey Lee Scruggs
Defendant:
Blake Dorning, Steven Morrison, Aurther Williams and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hacker v. Dorning et al
as 5:2011cv01420
Plaintiff:
Timothy Ray Hacker
Defendant:
Blake Dorning, Steve Morrison and Madison County Jail
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Biaso v. Koon
as 1:2011cv00606
Plaintiff:
John Thomas Biaso
Defendant:
Jack Koon, Brian Owens, Joseph Paris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blackmon v. Dorning
as 5:2011cv00524
Plaintiff:
Stephen Colby Blackmon
Defendant:
Blake Dorning
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Brown et al
as 5:2011cv00405
Plaintiff:
John Ashley Jones
Defendant:
Robert S Brown, III, Dennis E O'Dell, Callis Burgreen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Otey v. Dorning et al
as 5:2010cv02060
Plaintiff:
Randall B Otey
Defendant:
Blake Dorning, Nathan Beard, Madison County Commissioners and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mosley v. Dorning et al
as 5:2009cv02502
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lewis Mosley
Defendant:
Blake Dorning, Madison County Sheriff's Department, Madison County Metro Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holman v. Dorning et al
as 5:2009cv02199
Plaintiff:
Maurice Ltaubionjnire Holman
Defendant:
Blake Dorning, Madison County Jail, Marsh and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Powell v. Dorning et al
as 5:2009cv01707
Petitioner:
John Edward Powell, Jr
Respondent:
Blake Dorning and Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shields v. Dorning et al
as 5:2009cv01570
Plaintiff:
James Surget Shields, IV
Defendant:
Blake Dorning and Tommy Battle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
