Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Green v. Duffy et al
as 1:2022cv03175
Plaintiff:
Marlon J. Green
Defendant:
Jason Duffy, Ken Noble, Chelsea Napolean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Duffy et al
as 1:2022cv22514
Plaintiff:
Marlon J. Green
Defendant:
Jason Duffy, Ken Noble, Chelsea Napolean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
BROOKS v. BLEVINS et al
as 4:2019cv00288
Plaintiff:
ERIC K BROOKS
Defendant:
AARON JAMES BLEVINS, GLEN CHARLES FARMER, MICHAEL DELEO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blevins v. Mark et al
as 2:2019cv00688
Defendant:
Mr. Suitton, Mr. Rodge, Warden Picker and others
Plaintiff:
Reginald Blevins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blevins v. Mark et al
as 1:2019cv00214
Defendant:
Mr. Suitton, Mr. Rodge, Warden Picker and others
Plaintiff:
Reginald Blevins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blevins v. Terrelle et al
as 2:2018cv02033
Defendant:
Garden, Fleeton, Terrelle and others
Plaintiff:
Reginals T Blevins and Reginald T Blevins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blevins v. Alabama State Prison
as 1:2018cv00256
Plaintiff:
Reginald Blevins
Defendant:
Alabama State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BLEVINS v. SOUTHEAST REGIONAL DIRECTOR
as 4:2017cv00443
Petitioner:
SHONDOLYN BLEVINS
Respondent:
SOUTHEAST REGIONAL DIRECTOR, T JONES, DHO OFFICER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Daniel Cobble v. Joan Bloom, et al
as 17-11389
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Defendant - Appellee:
JOAN VAUGHN BLOOM, Cobb County Magistrate Judge, KENNITH O. NIX, Cobb County Superior Court Judge and RICHARD NOLAN BLEVINS, JR., Cobb County Assistant District Attorney
BLEVINS v. SOUTHEAST REGIONAL DIRECTOR et al
as 4:2016cv00789
Petitioner:
SHONDOLYN BLEVINS
Respondent:
SOUTHEAST REGIONAL DIRECTOR, T A JONES and ORR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
