Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Richard Blevins, et al v. International Brotherhood of T, et al
as 20-2977
Plaintiff / Appellee:
RICHARD BLEVINS, EDDIE RIZZO, GERALD JANES, JR. and others
Defendant / Appellant:
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, International Union and TERRY HANCOCK
Kevin Blevins-Mamon v. Dale Cockrell, et al
as 13-3907
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN J. BLEVINS-MAMON
Defendant - Appellee:
DALE COCKRELL and WENDY KNIGHT
Kevin Blevins v. Sergeant Patton, et al
as 11-1915
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN J. BLEVINS
Defendant - Appellee:
SERGEANT PATTON, OFFICER HENSLEY, OFFICER WESTERNAN and others
Scott Blevins v. Michael Astrue
as 11-1451
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SCOTT R. BLEVINS
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security
Kevin Blevins v. Andrew Gottfried, et al
as 10-2965
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN J. BLEVINS
Defendant - Appellee:
ANDREW GOTTFRIED and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-2526
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-2462
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Kevin Blevins-Mamon v. Frank Anderson, et al
as 10-1449
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN J. BLEVINS-MAMON
Defendant - Appellee:
FRANK ANDERSON, MARION COUNTY JAIL, INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Kevin Blevins-Mamon v. USA, et al
as 10-1416
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN J. BLEVINS-MAMON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Office of the United States Attorney, Hammond, IN and Indianapolis, IN, PETER SWAIM, US Marshal and K. FARIS, Inv. Research Spec.
Kevin Blevins v. Andrew Gottfried, et al
as 10-1244
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN J. BLEVINS-MAMON
Defendant - Appellee:
ANDREW GOTTFRIED and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
