Cases 21 - 30 of 74
Blevins v. Pfizer, Inc.
as 3:2017cv05381
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Larry S. Blevins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Patricia Alexander et al v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv05327
Plaintiff:
Patricia Alexander, Pamela Berry, Virtis Blevins and others
Defendant:
Does, McKesson Corporation and Pfizer, Inc.
Alexander et al
as 2:2017cv05322
Plaintiff:
Patricia Alexander, Pamela Berry, Virtis Blevins and others
Blevins v. Five Guys Enterprises LLC et al
as 2:2017cv00732
Defendant:
Five Guys Enterprises LLC , Encore FGBF, LLC , ERE Hanford FGBF, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Blevins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Blevins v. Five Guys Enterprises LLC et al
as 2:2017at00373
Defendant:
Five Guys Enterprises LLC , Encore FGBF, LLC , ER Hanford FG, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Blevins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Terrell v. Portfolio Recovery Associates LLC
as 3:2016cv02553
Plaintiff:
Eli Terrell , Armando Aguilar , Michael Arroyo and others
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
John Erving v. Search Initiatives, Inc. et al
as 5:2016cv01567
Defendant:
William Blevins, Calle Capital Corporation, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. John Erving
Barquero v. Obama et al
as 3:2016cv01293
Plaintiff:
Amilcar Barquero
Defendant:
Barack Obama, Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Eric H. Holder , Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker v. Ethosenergy Power Plant Services, LLC et al
as 2:2016at00111
Plaintiff:
Phillip Parker
Defendant:
Ethosenergy Power Plant Services, LLC , John Wood Group, PLC and Dave Blevins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Parker v. Ethosenergy Power Plant Services, LLC, et al.
as 2:2016cv00238
Plaintiff:
Phillip Parker and Randy E. Thomas
Defendant:
Ethosenergy Power Plant Services, LLC , John Wood Group, PLC and Dave Blevins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
