Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Hurt v. District of Colombia Board of
as 13-4474
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Tyrone Hurt
Defendant - Appellee:
District of Colombia Board of Parole and Narcotics Agents, 1972
Bailey v. Pataki
as 13-3412
Plaintiff:
Robert Trocchio, Jorge Burgos, Jr., Louis Massei and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kenneth Bailey
Defendant - Appellee:
George Pataki, former Governor of New York State, Eileen Consilvio, former Executive Director, Manhattan Psychiatric Center and Kirby Forensic Psychiatric Center, John Doe(s), # 1, Commissioner of the New York State Department of Corrections and others
Hurt v. D/C Board of Parole et al
as 1:2013cv05365
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Hurt
Defendant:
D/C Board of Parole, Narcotics Agents (1942) and Board of Parole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
George et al v. Tabone et al
as 1:2013cv00581
Plaintiff:
Allison George and Harold George
Defendant:
Sharon Tabone, New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, New York State Board of Parole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Benjamin v. Lemons, Jr. et al
as 1:2010cv04067
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Benjamin
Defendant:
Commissioner Jared Brown, Commissioner James B. Ferguson, Commissioner Henry Lemons, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bailey v. Pataki
as 10-2563
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Kenneth Bailey, Robert Trocchio, Jorge Burgos, Jr. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
George Pataki, former Governor of New York State, Eileen Consilvio, former Executive Director, Manhattan Psychiatric Center and Kirby Forensic Psychiatric Center, John Doe, # 1, Commissioner of the New York State Department of Corrections and others
Borcsok v. Crowe et al
as 1:2007cv00429
Plaintiff:
Bela Borcsok
Defendant:
William R. Crowe, Vanessa A. Clarke, Thomas Grant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
