Cases 1 - 9 of 9
PAVONI et al v. DERVIAN et al
as 2:2023cv00012
Defendant:
PEMAQUID MARINE AND BOATWORKS, THEODORE S DERVIAN and TRANSOM BOAT WORKS
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN PAVONI and KIMBERLY PAVONI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
KW BOATS et al v. ASSOCIATED INDUSTRIES INSURANCE COMPANY INC
as 1:2022cv00088
Plaintiff:
KW BOATS, KENWAY CORP, KENNETH PRIEST and others
Defendant:
ASSOCIATED INDUSTRIES INSURANCE COMPANY INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
IN RE: BOAT AARON & MELISSA INC
as 2:2021cv00001
In Re:
ETHAN WARD, ROBERT BLETHEN, JR and MICHAEL PORPER
Counter Claimant:
JEFFREY MATTHEWS and ASHLEY GROSS
Counter Defendant:
BOAT AARON & MELISSA INC
Claimant:
ANN PREBLE, MATTHEW WARD and JENNIFER WARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
ROYAL RIVER BOAT REPAIR INC et al v. MISS BEHAVIN M/V
as 2:2018cv00464
Plaintiff:
ROYAL RIVER BOATYARD INC and ROYAL RIVER BOAT REPAIR INC
Defendant:
MISS BEHAVIN M/V
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 31325
WITTENBORN v. NORTHERN BAY BOATS LLC
as 1:2018cv00397
Defendant:
NORTHERN BAY BOATS LLC
Plaintiff:
DAVID WITTENBORN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
BROOKLIN BOAT YARD INC v. STARKWEATHER & SHEPLEY INSURANCE BROKERAGE INCORPORATED
as 1:2016cv00588
Plaintiff:
BROOKLIN BOAT YARD INC
Defendant:
STARKWEATHER & SHEPLEY INSURANCE BROKERAGE INCORPORATED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TRADITIONAL BOAT LLC v. ARIEL S/V et al
as 1:2015cv00123
Plaintiff:
TRADITIONAL BOAT LLC
Defendant:
ARIEL S/V
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
OLD UNITED CASUALTY COMPANY v. FLOWERS BOAT WORKS et al
as 2:2015cv00043
Plaintiff:
OLD UNITED CASUALTY COMPANY
Defendant:
FLOWERS BOAT WORKS and UNDERWATER LIGHTS USA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
LULU INC v. CHESAPEAKE BOATS INC
as 1:2009cv00037
Plaintiff:
LULU INC
Defendant:
CHESAPEAKE BOATS INC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
