Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02710
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
JENSEN et al v. BOB EVANS FARMS, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv00921
Defendant:
BOB EVANS FARMS LLC and BOB EVANS RESTAURANTS, LLC
Plaintiff:
Regina Jensen, Vickie Rash and Rebecca Bailey
HIGH v. BOB EVANS RESTAURANT
as 3:2019cv13481
Defendant:
BOB EVANS RESTAURANT, ABC CORP(S) 1-10 and JOHN DOE(S) 1-10
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN C. HIGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
MCKEEL v. BOB EVANS FARMS, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv00082
Plaintiff:
APRIL MCKEEL
Defendant:
BOB EVANS FARMS, INC., BOB EVANS FARMS, LLC, BOB EVANS RESTAURANTS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
WILLIAMS et al v. BOB EVANS RESTAURANTS, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv01353
Plaintiff:
DOREEN WILLIAMS and TIFFANY WILLIAMS
Defendant:
BOB EVANS FARMS, INC. and BOB EVANS RESTAURANTS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Miller v. Bob Evans Farms, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01538
Plaintiff:
David Miller
Defendant:
Bob Evans Farms, Inc., Douglas N. Benham, Charles E. Elson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01237
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
EVANS v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC
as 2:2014cv00520
Plaintiff:
BOB EVANS
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CARROLL et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2013cv05840
Plaintiff:
GEORGE IRA CARROLL , DAMOS CARTER , CHARLES RAY CARTER, SR. and others
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
