Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plumley v. Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01448
Plaintiff:
Patrick Plumley
Defendant:
Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc., Charles F. Bolden, Jr., Walter G. Borst and others
Halberstam v. Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings Inc. et al
as 7:2022cv09408
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Halberstam
Defendant:
Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings Inc., Duncan J. McNabb, Charles F. Bolden, Jr. and others
Sabatini v. Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc. et al
as 7:2022cv09389
Plaintiff:
Eric Sabatini
Defendant:
Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc., Charles F. Bolden, Jr., Walter G. Borst and others
Halberstam v. Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc. et al
as 7:2022cv09108
Plaintiff:
Meyer Halberstam
Defendant:
Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc., Duncan J. McNabb, Charles F. Bolden, Jr. and others
Okin v. Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc. et al
as 7:2022cv08778
Plaintiff:
Alexander Okin
Defendant:
Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc., Charles F. Bolden, Jr., Walter G. Borst and others
Stein v. Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc. et al
as 7:2022cv08555
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Defendant:
Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc., Charles F. Bolden, Jr., Walter G. Borst and others
Griffin et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2015dp20103
Plaintiff:
Lynn Lawson Griffin and Bobby J. Griffin
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moore v. Griffin
as 9:2013cv00003
Plaintiff:
Billy Moore
Defendant:
Bobby J Griffin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dixon v. Griffin et al
as 1:2007cv00599
Plaintiff:
Christoper I Dixon
Defendant:
Bobby J Griffin and TDCJ-ID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. Griffin et al
as 1:2007cv00583
Plaintiff:
Christopher Irving Dixon
Defendant:
Bobby J Griffin and TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
